Y Schitzo ???
Theorem of Schitzoness
Suppose u set a status, lets call it S, and after a day or two u happen to view the status and exclaim 'whaat!, who put that status!'
*deep breathe*The statement 'whaat!, who put that status!' is conversely proportionate to the initial argument stating that you set the status in the first place.
As contradictory as this may seem it is however a perfect case of Schitzoness. The theorem(in short) is thus :
if (person A sets a status S = true) & ( S is not recognisable(R) by A )
then Schitzoness = true
a shorter version would be: if ((A sets S) & (S !R A))
then Schitzoness = true
lol..i cant believe i just made all that up :P
Suppose u set a status, lets call it S, and after a day or two u happen to view the status and exclaim 'whaat!, who put that status!'
*deep breathe*The statement 'whaat!, who put that status!' is conversely proportionate to the initial argument stating that you set the status in the first place.
As contradictory as this may seem it is however a perfect case of Schitzoness. The theorem(in short) is thus :
if (person A sets a status S = true) & ( S is not recognisable(R) by A )
then Schitzoness = true
a shorter version would be: if ((A sets S) & (S !R A))
then Schitzoness = true
lol..i cant believe i just made all that up :P
1 Comments:
At 12:35 PM, neverBlink said…
somebody spent waaaay too much time in calculus lectures ;)
Post a Comment
<< Home